Trump's Judicial Nominees Are Fact-challenged And Unfit

Who won nan 2020 election?

Was nan Capitol attacked connected Jan. 6, 2021?

Can Donald Trump beryllium elected to a 3rd word arsenic president?

No brainers, right?

The answers are, of course, “Joe Biden,” “yes” and “no.” Any fact- and reality-based American would opportunity so. But that humongous people of group pointedly doesn’t see nan president of nan United States. And apparently for that reason, his nominees for national judgeships — nan very jobs successful which you’d astir want fact-based individuals — hem, haw, stammer and yet diminution to springiness nonstop answers erstwhile Democratic senators trial them pinch specified easy-peasy questions astatine confirmation hearings.

One aft another, period aft month, Trump nominees for territory and appeals courts crossed nan onshore opportunity that nan answers to nan questions are matters of debate, of “significant governmental dispute.” Well, they’re successful conflict only because Trump says they are, arsenic does each eager officeholder and office-seeker hopeless to stay successful nan retributive ruler’s bully graces — including, alas, would-be judges.

To watch them squirm and past squirt retired nan aforesaid rehearsed reply, nan aforesaid legalistic connection salad, conscionable for illustration nan dozens of nominees earlier them would beryllium hilarious (see below) if it weren’t truthful ominous for nan norm of rule successful nan nation.

Trump nominees for different high-ranking jobs, likewise prepped for Senate Democrats’ questions by their Trump handlers, give nan aforesaid rote response. But nan truth that candidates for life seats connected nan national bench, making decisions of life-changing consequences for millions of Americans, would take to dodge nan truth is astir sickening.

In their truth-trolling to support Trump happy, lest he yank their chance astatine caller achromatic robes, these candidates neglect nan trial of judicial independence. As 1 Democrat, Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, told 4 territory judge nominees past week astatine a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, their humiliating hedging “on an rumor of fact” — Biden won successful 2020 — “reflects not only connected your honesty but really connected your fittingness to beryllium a national judge.”

Indeed. That judicial nominees would curry Trump’s favour bodes sick for early national jurisprudence successful the 1 branch of authorities that’s stood up for nan norm of rule against Trump, repeatedly, erstwhile Congress and nan Supreme Court person not. To beryllium fair, a number of judges confirmed successful Trump’s first word person been among nan galore who’ve ruled against his and his administration’s second-term abuses of power. Yet conscionable arsenic Trump has populated his Cabinet and executive branch pinch sycophants, dissimilar successful Trump 1.0, he’s evidently applying caller litmus tests to imaginable judges. One of them, clearly, is playing on pinch his predetermination lies.

His nominees’ nonaccomplishment to speak truth to Trump’s powerfulness should beryllium disqualifying. But they’re not disqualified, because nan Senate is tally by Republicans who stock their fearfulness of him.

That truth is simply a large logic to dream that Democrats seizure nan mostly successful November’s midterm elections and that, nether caller management, nan Senate will yet return earnestly its law “advice and consent” work to enactment arsenic a cheque connected Trump nominees for nan last 2 years of his word — including, perhaps, 1 for nan Supreme Court.

And, yes, this is Trump’s last term, for each of his teasing astir “Trump 2028.” The Constitution’s 22nd Amendment says arsenic overmuch successful its opening line: “No personification shall beryllium elected to nan agency of nan President much than twice.”

Yet nan 4 wannabe territory judges astatine last week’s Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing — Michael J. Hendershot of Ohio; Arthur Roberts Jones and John G.E. Marck, some of Texas; and Jeffrey T. Kuntz of Florida — struggled complete that clear language.

All 4 hesitated erstwhile Sen. Chris Coons, a Delaware Democrat, asked them to picture nan amendment. He moreover publication its first words earlier querying Marck, “Is President Trump eligible to tally for president again successful 2028?”

Marck paused, past sputtered: “Senator, pinch ah, without considering each nan facts and looking astatine everything, depending connected what nan business is, this to maine strikes arsenic much of a hypothetical of thing that could beryllium raised.”

“It’s not a hypothetical,” Coons countered, past asked again whether Trump is “eligible to tally for a 3rd word nether our Constitution.”

“Um, I would person to, to reappraisal the, nan existent wording of it,” Marck blabbered.

Coons turned to nan others: “Anybody other brave capable to opportunity that nan Constitution of nan United States prevents President Trump from seeking a 3rd term?” Silence.

“Anybody consenting to use nan Constitution by its plain connection successful nan 22nd Amendment?” Coons persisted. Crickets.

His Democratic colleague, Blumenthal, inquired of nan foursome, “Who won nan 2020 election?” All agreed successful move that Biden “was certified” nan winner. None would opportunity he “won” because — arsenic we and they cognize —Trump insists to this time that he won; he’s turned nan powerfulness of his “Justice” Department to trying to beryllium that evident falsehood. Far beryllium it from these early judges to contradict nan president who nominated them.

Here’s Hendershot’s gibberish to Blumenthal’s elemental query: “Senator, I want to beryllium mindful of nan canons here. I cognize this mobility has travel up galore times successful these hearings and it’s go an rumor of important governmental conflict and debate. So, with, pinch that, I would opportunity that, that President Biden was certified nan victor of nan 2020 election.”

After nan others replied similarly, Blumenthal turned justifiably scathing: “It’s beautiful irrefutable that Joe Biden won nan election. But you’re unwilling to usage that connection because you are afraid. You are afraid. Of what? President Trump? That is precisely what we do not request connected nan national chair today. We request jurists who are fearless and strong, not anemic and pathetic.”

Apparently unshamed, each likewise demurred erstwhile he asked if nan Capitol had been attacked. “You’ve seen nan videos, person you not?” Blumenthal blurted.

No matter, Senator. These would-be triers of truth apparently won’t judge their eyes. Not erstwhile their patron, nan president, insists connected lies.

Bluesky: @jackiecalmes
Threads: @jkcalmes
X: @jackiekcalmes