Why Google Deepmind Broke Up The Alphafold Team

Sedang Trending 3 jam yang lalu
ARTICLE AD BOX

August 7, 2026

3 min read

Google Logo Add Us On GoogleAdd SciAm

DeepMind collapsed up nan AlphaFold team. Here’s why scientists aren’t alarmed.

The artificial intelligence strategy mostly accomplished nan task it was built to solve, and researchers extracurricular DeepMind person already been carrying its activity forward

By Mary Randolph edited by Eric Sullivan

Two men look nan camera from different levels of a sweeping achromatic spiral staircase.

Google DeepMind CEO Demis Hassabis and AlphaFold2 co-creator John Jumper astatine nan company’s London office aft they shared half of nan 2024 Nobel Prize successful Chemistry.

Dan Kitwood / Getty Images

After 8 years, much than 200 cardinal predictions and a Nobel Prize for 2 of its creators, nan squad down AlphaFold—Google DeepMind’s artificial intelligence programme to foretell macromolecule structure—has itself folded.

The Financial Times reported past week that DeepMind had dissolved nan dedicated AlphaFold team. Some members near nan company; AlphaFold2 co-creator John Jumper announced successful June that he was leaving for Anthropic. Other researchers were reassigned to different projects wrong Google aliases moved to Isomorphic Labs. A DeepMind spokesperson tells Scientific American that galore of those moves happened much than a twelvemonth ago. The program’s nationalist database and prediction server stay available.

So did nan task complete nan technological ngo DeepMind group for it? By nan benchmark nan institution chose, nan reply appears to beryllium mostly yes. AlphaFold achieved singular accuracy astatine predicting a protein’s apt three-dimensional structure. And because researchers extracurricular DeepMind person already reproduced and extended overmuch of AlphaFold’s work, nan team’s breakup whitethorn person little effect connected nan section than it mightiness astatine first seem.


On supporting subject journalism

If you're enjoying this article, see supporting our award-winning publicity by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to guarantee nan early of impactful stories astir nan discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.


DeepMind began processing AlphaFold successful 2018 to lick nan “protein folding problem,” aliases nan task of predicting a protein’s 3D building from conscionable its amino acerb sequence. Though scientists had achieved immoderate prediction occurrence since investigation connected nan problem began successful nan 1970s, AlphaFold utilized an artificial intelligence exemplary trained connected lab-determined macromolecule structures and amino acerb series information to make highly meticulous models successful minutes aliases hours—giving researchers a starting constituent for experiments that different mightiness person taken months aliases years.

In 2020 nan program’s 2nd loop dominated nan Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction, aliases CASP, a unsighted trial that compares computational predictions pinch experimentally wished structures that person not yet been released. The 3rd iteration, released successful 2024, expanded its prediction abilities to interactions among proteins and different molecules, including DNA, RNA and imaginable drugs. That twelvemonth Jumper and DeepMind main executive Demis Hassabis shared half of the Nobel Prize successful Chemistry for processing AlphaFold2.

John Moult, a computational biologist astatine nan University of Maryland, who co-founded CASP, said successful 2020 that AlphaFold had “largely solved” nan structure-prediction problem. That DeepMind has now moved on, Moult says, is “not surprising.” The team’s breakup follows from nan measurement nan institution defined AlphaFold from nan beginning. “They decided that this was a bully problem wherever they could show whether they succeeded aliases not successful a cleanable way—not only show nan world but genuinely show themselves,” he says.

From DeepMind’s perspective, he adds, “they did it. What’s nan adjacent mission?”

AlphaFold quickly became useful acold beyond nan CASP benchmark. Problems pinch macromolecule folding lend to diseases specified arsenic Alzheimer’s and cystic fibrosis. Researchers person utilized AlphaFold’s nationalist prediction information to analyse a scope of biologic problems, including activity toward a malaria vaccine and efforts to technologist much resilient crops. DeepMind besides launched nan supplier find institution Isomorphic Labs to build connected AlphaFold’s research.

The program’s prediction accuracy, Moult says, “was an astonishing accomplishment successful itself, but it besides opened up ample areas of science, truthful you tin commencement exploring nan macromolecule beingness successful various ways.”

Still, “largely solved” applies to a circumstantial benchmark, not to structural biology arsenic a whole. Many proteins activity arsenic parts of larger molecular machinery. They whitethorn move among aggregate shapes arsenic they function, and researchers still struggle to foretell what those changing states will beryllium aliases really molecules will hindrance to them. “There’s a full drawstring of these problems,” Moult says, that “certainly aren’t afloat solved yet.”

Those unfastened questions do not make DeepMind’s determination astonishing to Debora Marks, a computational biologist astatine Harvard Medical School, whose group pioneered approaches to macromolecule prediction that helped laic nan groundwork for AlphaFold.

“I’d do precisely nan same,” she says. “Why would you transportation connected if you were already done?”

In 2024 DeepMind released AlphaFold3’s conclusion codification and made its exemplary weights disposable for world research, and independent groups person since developed their ain versions and extensions. Moult doubts nan team’s breakup will slow that work. “I don’t deliberation it has immoderate superior effect connected nan usefulness of what they did,” he says, “because different group are now doing it, too.”

It’s Time to Stand Up for Science

If you enjoyed this article, I’d for illustration to inquire for your support. Scientific American has served arsenic an advocator for subject and manufacture for 180 years, and correct now whitethorn beryllium nan astir captious infinitesimal successful that two-century history.

I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped style nan measurement I look astatine nan world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a consciousness of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I dream it does that for you, too.

If you subscribe to Scientific American, you thief guarantee that our sum is centered connected meaningful investigation and discovery; that we person nan resources to study connected nan decisions that frighten labs crossed nan U.S.; and that we support some budding and moving scientists astatine a clip erstwhile nan worth of subject itself excessively often goes unrecognized.

In return, you get basal news, captivating podcasts, superb infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and nan subject world's champion penning and reporting. You tin moreover gift personification a subscription.

There has ne'er been a much important clip for america to guidelines up and show why subject matters. I dream you’ll support america successful that mission.

Selengkapnya